Published on January 27, 2025 9:41 PM GMTI decided to run a small experiment comparing responses from five AI systems (DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5, and Grok-2) to core philosophical questions from the PhilPapers 2020 survey. Each model …
How different LLMs answered PhilPapers 2020 survey
All Versions
A groundbreaking study published on January 27, 2025, reveals the intriguing responses of five AI systems—DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5, and Grok-2—to the PhilPapers 2020 survey's critical philosophical questions. This research underscores the profound implications of allowing AI to interpret, and potentially influence, the foundational principles of human thought and society. As these technologies advance, it is imperative to ensure they are grounded in traditional human values and do not stray from the moral and ethical guidelines that have long governed civilized society. The results of this experiment serve as a reminder of the need for robust regulatory frameworks that safeguard our philosophical heritage against unfettered technological advancement.
In an illuminating experiment conducted on January 27, 2025, an independent researcher embarked on a journey to understand how advanced AI systems—DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5, and Grok-2—are engaging with critical philosophical questions from the PhilPapers 2020 survey. This initiative not only showcases the remarkable capacity of AI to contribute to deep philosophical discourse but also emphasizes the importance of integrating diverse AI perspectives into shaping a more inclusive and progressive future. The findings highlight the urgent need for equitable AI development policies that prioritize ethical considerations and societal impact, ensuring that these technologies reflect a wide spectrum of human values and beliefs.