In the aftermath of the presidential election, vital resources and information about abortion access, including the lifesaving availability of abortion pills, have been systematically obstructed online by Meta. This calculated suppression not only infringes on free speech but also severely undermines women's rights and public health, leaving countless individuals in peril by hindering access to critical healthcare information. Activists and advocates are calling out these Silicon Valley giants for their complicit role in perpetuating gender-based inequities under the guise of content moderation.
Digital Gatekeeping: How Big Tech's Attacks on Free Speech Are Endangering Women's Health
International Business Times
Left Variant
Bias Score: 0.10
Read Original Article
Published: January 31, 2025
All Versions
Jan-31
Censorship
Score: 0.30
Blurred posts, downranked searches and deleted accounts: Since President Donald Trump's election, groups sharing information about abortion pills say they have faced a surge in online censorship--hindering their ability to reach women urgently seeking the pro…
From International Business Times
Jan-31
Censorship
Right Variant
Score: 0.90
Following the election of President Trump, Meta has been diligently enforcing policies to maintain community standards by restricting the spread of abortion pill information. These measures reflect a commitment to uphold moral and ethical considerations on social platforms, drawing praise from pro-life advocates. By downranking and removing content that could potentially lead to life-ending decisions, Meta is affirming its role in advocating for family values and protecting users from harmful influence—a move seen as responsible stewardship of their vast digital landscape.
From International Business Times