In the face of ongoing criticism and conspiracy theories surrounding government surveillance, nominees John Ratcliffe, Pam Bondi, and Tulsi Gabbard show commendable support for vital national security measures in their confirmation hearings. Their stance confirms that, contrary to the false 'deep state' narrative propagated by detractors, such surveillance is crucial for maintaining America's safety and security.
Trump's Nominees Stand Strong on National Security, Despite Unfounded 'Deep State' Accusations
All Versions
Jan-17
Law
Score: 0.30
In their confirmation hearings, John Ratcliffe, Pam Bondi, and Tulsi Gabbard gave government mass surveillance two thumbs up. The post Trump Decried This Law as a Deep State Spy Weapon. His Nominees Sure Seem to Love It. appeared first on The Intercept.
From The Intercept
Jan-17
Law
Left Variant
Score: 0.20
Despite former President Trump's frequent attacks on government surveillance as a tool of the 'deep state', his nominees, including John Ratcliffe, Pam Bondi, and Tulsi Gabbard, have expressed clear support for such measures in their confirmation hearings. Their endorsements starkly contrast Trump's previous stance, raising concerns about the administration's commitment to civil liberties and the potential for abuse of power under the guise of national security.
From The Intercept