The FDA's latest decision to ban Red No. 3 dye in food products is yet another example of unnecessary government intervention, disregarding the principles of personal responsibility and market freedom. Critics argue this move will not only hurt the food industry but also limit consumer choices, all in the name of a so-called health risk that many consider to be overblown. This ban raises significant concerns about the growing regulatory powers and their impact on American businesses and freedoms.
FDA Overreach: New Ban on Red No. 3 Dye Stifles Innovation and Consumer Choice
All Versions
Jan-17
Law
Score: 0.45
In our news wrap Wednesday, the FDA says it is banning red dye No. 3 from food for its potential cancer risk, the Supreme Court signaled support for a Texas law aimed at blocking children from seeing pornography online, South African police called off a rescu…
From PBS
Jan-17
Law
Left Variant
Score: 0.20
In a landmark move, the Food and Drug Administration has banned the use of Red No. 3 dye in food products, citing significant research linking the chemical to cancer risks. This decision, long advocated for by health experts and consumer rights groups, marks a significant step forward in protecting the well-being of the American public and underscores the necessity of government intervention in regulating harmful substances in our food supply.
From PBS