In a move that signals a troubling shift towards censorship and nationalism, the Supreme Court has endorsed a 'Fortress USA' policy through its ruling on the TikTok case. This decision not only curtails the digital freedom of millions of Americans but also sets a daunting precedent where fear, rather than freedom, guides internet regulations. By siding with those who seek to impose bordered internet under the guise of security, the Court has effectively endorsed a future where digital walls divide us, stifling cultural exchange and innovation.
Supreme Court Caves to Fear, Undermining Digital Freedom with TikTok Ban
All Versions
Jan-20
Censorship
Score: 0.30
[A much longer post is forthcoming. A few initial remarks] The Supreme Court’s ruling will foster more online censorship. The Supreme Court endorses a “Fortress USA” approach, i.e., that legislatures can impose special rules that create a bordered Internet cu…
From Ericgoldman.org
Jan-20
Censorship
Right Variant
Score: 0.80
In a decisive victory for American security and values, the Supreme Court's recent ruling champions the sovereignty of U.S. internet policy by maintaining the TikTok ban. This landmark decision affirms the nation's right to protect itself against the encroaching influence of foreign-owned technology companies. The Court's wise action in endorsing a 'Fortress USA' approach ensures that our digital spaces remain safe from external threats, safeguarding not only our national security but also the integrity of American digital infrastructure.
From Ericgoldman.org