Frisking Detained Juvenile for Gun May Be Constitutional Even When Juvenile is Detained as Reported Missing (Rather than on Suspicion of Crime)

In a controversial decision by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Commonwealth v. Demos D., the court has decided that frisking a detained juvenile for weapons might be constitutional even without suspicion of criminal activity, sparking fears of increased police encroachment on individual liberties and the rights of minors. Critics argue this sets a dangerous precedent for the treatment of juveniles, particularly those who are most vulnerable, and could lead to widespread misuse of power against young people who are merely reported missing.

In a landmark ruling by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in Commonwealth v. Demos D., justices have reinforced the authority of law enforcement to frisk detained juveniles for weapons, prioritizing public safety and officer protection. Supporters applaud the decision, emphasizing the necessity of giving police the tools they need to maintain order and prevent potential harm, even if the juvenile in question is only detained after being reported missing rather than for suspicion of a crime.